The vapor, iqos sigara
for instance, kent glo
contains various volatile organic compounds that you'd not otherwise put into your body. It's a thorny issue, because e-cigarettes are less likely to cause lung cancer and other forms of obvious physical harm. But just because people aren't inhaling smoke doesn't mean that vaping is somehow healthy in itself. There's also some research saying that the flavors used in specific blends are toxic to the lungs that could be as equally harmful as real cigarettes.
What's likely to cloud this issue even further is that even big tobacco are likely to transition its core business toward electronic smoking. But clearly that's only a step towards a smoke-free future, and one that doesn't go far enough for health chiefs
. That may, at least, push plenty more people away from cigarettes and toward their digital equivalents. Philip Morris has already begun selling a tobacco vaporizer in Japan, and has submitted it to the FDA for approval.
But that hasn't stopped the Surgeon General from objecting to the rise in e-cigarette use, especially amongst young people. Vivek Murthy has posted a report saying that the devices are a public health issue because they're not a cure for the real problem of nicotine
addition. -text c-gray-1" >We know that smoking is bad for you, which is why so many people have switched across to vaping as a (theoretically) safer alternative.
That means that the kids, who are vapin' away like nobody's business, are forming addictive pathways that could lead onto harder stuff when they're older. Murthy's biggest concern, however, is that introducing nicotine to young minds will increase their propensity to become addicts. The neural pathways that are built in adolescence shape how we behave as an adult, including our impulse control. The FDA currently blocks sales of the devices to under 18s, but the report claims that a proportion of sixth graders have tried it.